AS2 Solution Comparisons

See how Serverless AS2 compares to other AS2 solutions and protocols.

Quick Comparison Overview

Here's a high-level comparison of AS2 solutions:

Feature Serverless AS2 AWS Transfer Family OpenAS2 Commercial
Monthly Cost (Low Volume) $0 $220+ $15-30 $500-2000+
Monthly Cost (1000 msgs/day) $1-3 $500+ $30+ $500-2000+
Setup Time 15 minutes Hours Hours-Days Days-Weeks
Web UI Full-featured AWS Console None Yes
Open Source Yes No Yes No
Auto-scaling Yes Yes No Varies
Maintenance Zero Low High Low
Infrastructure Your AWS account Your AWS account Your servers Vendor cloud/on-prem

Serverless AS2 vs AWS Transfer Family

Most Common Comparison

Both solutions run on AWS, but they have very different pricing models and feature sets.

Aspect Serverless AS2 AWS Transfer Family
Pricing Model Pay-per-use only Always-on ($0.30/hr) + per message
Minimum Monthly Cost $0 (Free Tier) $220 (endpoint always running)
Cost at 1000 msgs/day ~$1-3/month ~$500/month
Web Interface Dedicated management UI AWS Console only
Partner Management Visual UI with forms CLI/Console configuration
Message Tracking Built-in TrackLog UI CloudWatch logs
Setup Complexity Single command Multiple console steps
Open Source Yes - GPL-3.0 No - AWS managed service
Potential Savings: Save $217+/month compared to AWS Transfer Family at low volumes. At 1000 messages/day, save approximately $497/month (~99% savings).
Choose Serverless AS2 if: You want lower costs, a better management UI, or open-source flexibility.
Choose AWS Transfer Family if: You need AWS-managed service with AWS support contracts.

Serverless AS2 vs OpenAS2

Both are open-source AS2 solutions, but with different architectures.

Aspect Serverless AS2 OpenAS2
Architecture Serverless (AWS Lambda) Java application on server
Infrastructure Fully managed AWS services Self-managed server (EC2, on-prem)
Monthly Cost $0 (Free Tier) $15-30 (EC2 instance)
Scaling Automatic Manual (bigger server)
High Availability Built-in (multi-AZ) Requires manual setup
Maintenance Zero OS patches, Java updates, backups
Configuration Web UI XML files
Setup Time 15 minutes Hours to days
Choose Serverless AS2 if: You want zero maintenance, auto-scaling, and easier configuration.
Choose OpenAS2 if: You need to run on-premises or have existing Java infrastructure.

Serverless AS2 vs Commercial Solutions

Commercial AS2 solutions (Cleo, Axway, IBM Sterling, etc.) offer enterprise features but at enterprise prices.

Aspect Serverless AS2 Commercial (Cleo, IBM, etc.)
Monthly Cost $0-20 $500-2000+
Licensing Free (GPL-3.0) Annual license fees
Setup Time 15 minutes Days to weeks
Support Community / GitHub Vendor support contracts
EDI Translation Not included Often included
Multiple Protocols AS2 only AS2, SFTP, FTPS, etc.
Compliance Certs AWS compliance Vendor certifications
Choose Serverless AS2 if: Cost is a concern, you only need AS2, or you're a small/medium business.
Choose Commercial if: You need vendor support contracts, EDI translation, or multi-protocol support.

AS2 vs SFTP

Understanding when to use AS2 versus SFTP for B2B file transfers.

Feature AS2 SFTP
Delivery Receipt Yes (MDN) No built-in receipt
Non-repudiation Yes (signed MDN) No
Push Model Yes (HTTP POST) Requires polling or triggers
Encryption Payload + Transport Transport only
Retailer Requirement Required by most Sometimes accepted
Setup Complexity Higher (certificates) Lower (SSH keys)
Use AS2 when: Trading partner requires it, you need delivery receipts, or compliance requires non-repudiation.
Use SFTP when: Simpler file transfers are acceptable and receipts aren't required.

Summary: Which Solution Should You Choose?

Best for Cost Savings

Serverless AS2 - $0/month on Free Tier, pay only for what you use.

Best for Ease of Use

Serverless AS2 - Web UI, single-command deploy, no XML config.

Best for Enterprise Support

Commercial Solutions - Vendor support contracts and SLAs.

Best for On-Premises

OpenAS2 - Run on your own servers without cloud dependency.